Custom Search Engine - Scans Selected News Sites

Loading

Wednesday, 6 April 2011

From Today's Papers - 06 Apr 2011






Dhoni set to join Army!
Ajay Banerjee/TNS  New Delhi, April 5 Cricket World Cup-winning captain MS Dhoni is set to be commissioned in the Territorial Army as an honorary officer. Army Chief General VK Singh made the offer to Dhoni here tonight.  “Dhoni has accepted the offer and the case for his induction will be processed as per the procedure,” a senior Army official confirmed. Dhoni along with all-rounder Suresh Raina had called on the Army Chief at his residence here this evening where the cricketers were congratulated. Singh praised Dhoni on his leadership qualities. The cricketer told him that he always wanted to join the Army.  Sources said the rank to be conferred on Dhoni would be decided later. The other World Cup-winning captain Kapil Dev was commissioned as a Lieutenant Colonel in the Territorial Army two years ago and he had even undergone weapons training.









Soldier's eyelids glued shut in initiation ceremony
London:  The eyelids of a British teenaged soldier were glued together in an initiation ceremony and doctors had to cut them open, leaving the soldier without eyelashes.  The Sun reported that 17-year-old Scott Parker of 2 Royal Anglian Regiment screamed as he was allegedly strapped down before the glue was poured on him at the Dhekelia base in Cyprus.  The teenager was rescued when his shrieks were heard by officers who rushed to help him in the midnight assault.  Parker was left temporarily blinded.
He was taken to the base's hospital where doctors had to cut along the glue line, leaving him with no eyelashes.  Three privates - Lee O'Leary, Jack Parsler and Peter Cross - face a court martial for alleged assault.  "This is thought to be an initiation ceremony that went horribly wrong. Parker and other lads had been drinking in their block when he was pounced on. The superglue incident didn't happen in his room, but one of the other lads'," a source was quoted as saying.  "They strapped him to a bed with bungee rope before pouring superglue on his forehead.  "The soldiers didn't mean it to go into his eyes, but the glue ran down into them and caused utter agony. People heard him screaming for help and some of the non-commissioned officers ran in."









Ajai Shukla: Promoting crisis in the military
South Block is being roiled by a face-off between military and the ministry of defence, which co-exist at the best of times in mutual loathing Ajai Shukla / New Delhi April 5, 2011, 0:53 IST  South Block is being roiled by a face-off between military and the ministry of defence (MoD), which co-exist at the best of times in mutual loathing. Since September, the MoD has blocked the routine promotion of army officers to the senior-most levels of command. Today, the commanders of several army divisions and corps – combat formations that are headed by major generals and lieutenant generals, respectively – are serving extended tenures since nobody is being promoted to relieve them. The Indian Army’s elite 1 Corps, which strikes deep into enemy territory in war, currently has no commander. Two major general posts in the crucial Military Operations Directorate and one in Military Intelligence Directorate are lying vacant.  Such a situation is unthinkable in India’s security environment, where a combat-ready military is regarded as the deterrent that holds back more Mumbai-style terrorist attacks. Even before terrorism became a factor in our security calculus, the military valued smooth succession at higher levels of command. When former army chief and India’s military legend General S H F J Manekshaw found the MoD dilly-dallying on the appointment of one of his army commanders, he unilaterally issued an order posting a suitable general and asked the MoD to regularise it in due course.
But that was a different era and Manekshaw was Manekshaw. Since then the MoD has asserted its supremacy, especially in the 1998 sacking of navy chief Admiral Vishnu Bhagwat for refusing to implement the government’s appointment of Vice Admiral Harinder Singh as deputy chief of naval staff.  The cause of the ongoing confrontation is as follows: three years ago the army chief at the time, General Deepak Kapoor, implemented new criteria for promotion, in which subjectivity was minimised in assessing an officer’s suitability for higher rank. The new “quantification system” sought to translate into a set of numbers every measure of officers’ performance — in day-to-day functioning; on courses of instruction; special appointments; honours and awards and so on. This was to eliminate subjective judgement, which could scuttle a deserving candidate or elevate someone relatively less capable. This system was to be evaluated for three years and then tweaked if required.  When General V K Singh, the current army chief, took over from General Kapoor, feedback gleaned from army officers suggested changes in the quantification model. The new chief also decided to roll back another Kapoor-era policy to divide generals into two streams: those cleared for commanding combat formations and others who were cleared only to fill staff posts in headquarters. The army headquarters sought permission from the ministry, but the bureaucrats wondered why each new army chief had to tinker with promotion policies. For months, the matter hung in limbo.  Eventually, in January, the army promulgated the new quantification model and conducted promotion boards to the ranks of major general and lieutenant general, clearing all successful candidates for command and staff. Predictably, the MoD has refused to clear the board results. The army chief has met the defence minister, but there is no resolution. Mr Antony appears to agree with his bureaucrats who point out: every new army chief sets about reversing his predecessor’s policies.  Watchers of the Indian military believe that the absence of a formal promotion policy allows the flourishing of patrimonial interest, where policy changes are manipulated to benefit supporters and service constituencies. Unlike the civil services, where an iron-clad promotion policy has long existed, the military’s rulebook takes the form of policy letters, many of which are superseded as each new chief implements his ideas. This theoretically allows for responsive and adaptive promotion policies, but it also creates suspicion about the motives behind policy changes.  Noting that frequent policy changes have sharply increased the number of generals who approach the courts, the army’s former Judge Advocate General, Major General Nilendra Kumar, believes that, “When policy is changed almost every alternate year it indicates lack of consistency and suggests efforts to favour or bail out certain people. This leads to uncertainty and anxiety within the military.”  It also leads to poor policy, like the “pro-rata” system that the army implemented a decade ago. This involves allocating vacancies to each arm, at the rank of brigadier, in proportion to the number of officers in the arm. If the infantry comprised 55 per cent of all officers, they would get 55 per cent of all brigadier vacancies. Slammed by critics as the “Mandalisation of the army”, this divisive policy, backed by heavily populated arms like the infantry and the artillery, threw out the meritocracy that had governed higher rank in modern armies ever since the famous Prussian general staff had demonstrated its advantages.  Instead of learning from history, the army extended “pro-rata” to selecting major generals and was all set to extend this to the lieutenant general rank as well. Fortunately, when the proposal came up for discussion at the Army Commanders’ Conference in 2008, the famously outspoken Lieutenant General H S Panag acidly observed that the logical next step would be to select the army chief, not on merit or seniority, but turn by turn from each arm. That effectively quashed the proposal.  It is time to end the uncertainty caused by this endless tweaking of promotion policy. High-grade officers are retiring before their time, while the MoD refuses to release their promotion board results. The MoD must clear the army’s current proposals and ensure that all three services codify promotion policy in a simple rulebook.









Tough call
As a child, whenever I saw my father in his army uniform, I would dream of flaunting it one day. Since I always aspired to join the defence forces, I decided to give it a try after completing my BTech in information technology.  I kept browsing the Indian Army website to check the status of my selection for the Short Service Commission (SSC). One of those days, I chanced upon the link of 'Nat Geo-Mission Army' programme, which promised to offer participants a first-hand experience of a soldier.
I filled in the application form online before leaving for the audition in Mumbai, one of the three centres. All applicants had to go through several physical and mental tests to prove their competency level. I was one of the five city finalists from Mumbai and joined 10 others from Bangalore and Delhi for the medical examination that was conducted at the Army Medical Centre in the Capital.  While waiting anxiously for the results, of both SSC and the 'Mission Army' programme, I continued working in an IT company in Pune. Meanwhile, I took up cycling and started walking long distances to keep fit.  It was a big surprise when I was informed that I was one of the five candidates selected for Mission Army. I immediately packed my bags to embark on this lifechanging journey. Our first stop was the Indian Army Academy in Dehradun. A training module was prepared for us and that was my first brush with the life I wanted to lead in the future. In course of the programme, we completed several assignments at key Indian Army establishments such as Commando School in Belgaum, Combat Army Aviation Training School in Nasik, The Corps Battle School in Srinagar, The Parachute brigade in Agra, the Armoured Corps Centre in Ahmednagar and the Artillery Centre in Deolali.  The training at the Commando School was the most challenging. Though it was an academy for men, I had to go through the same drills as my male counterparts. As far as learning is concerned, I picked up techniques of self-defence , completed treacherous courses during drills, trained in heavy artillery and learnt survival techniques including catching a snake and cooking it. It was a tough routine that we followed and I learnt the hard way. We had to drive a tank, camouflaging ourselves. Since we were treated as freshers, we were also punished from time to time.  I got a taste of reality in Srinagar, where army personnel were deployed every 10 meters for our security. We were put through real-life battle situations and the experience was an eye opener. Mission Army has prepared me well for taking up army as a career option. I have been selected for the SSC women (technical) and I will soon be joining the officers training academy in Chennai for 49 weeks of military training. After this I will be commissioned as a lieutenant in the Indian Army, a moment I am looking forward to.








Dhoni accepts offer to join Indian Army
MS Dhoni offered honorary commission in Army  After having met the Supreme Commander of the armed forces, President Pratibha Patil, and the Indian Air Force (IAF) chief, Air Chief Marshal PV Naik here with promises of a fighter sortie in a Sukhoi-30MKI fighter, World Cup winning captain of the Indian team, Mahendra Singh Dhoni, was on Tuesday offered an honourary commission in the Territorial Army, during his meeting with the Army Chief, General VK Singh, here.  General Singh, met Dhoni and Suresh Raina, at Army House, and discussed the Indian team’s World Cup performance and also made the honorary commission offer to Dhoni, which he readily accepted, saying he was always interested in joining the Army, as a young boy. The commission would go through as per the laid-down procedure of the service. It may be noted that former captain Kapil Dev, is already an honorary Lieutenant Colonel in the Territorial Army, while Sachin Tendulkar was conferred an honorary Group Captain rank of the IAF in September last year, which was approved by the President of India.  Dhoni and his wife Sakshi, met the IAF chief, his wife, and the IAF top brass at their residence, here on Monday.  The IAF chief presented Dhoni a silver salver, as a gesture of felicitation, from the side of the entire IAF, while Dhoni in turn gave the IAF chief a cricket bat. Fresh from the success of the biggest event of the year, which India has achieved after 28 years, the entire cricket team and more so the captain, have been on a spree of felicitations from eminent personalities, from all walks of life.  MS Dhoni offered honorary commission in Army –








Army closes road to their homes, residents protest
Residents of Maruti Bungalows I and II near airport circle were asked to use the Hansol CST depot road after the defence force closed a road passing through army’s firing range and cantonment area
Residents of 100 homes near the airport circle held a dharna after the army blocked a road  passing through army’s firing range and cantonment area that led to their houses. The army on Friday night closed the road without any prior notice to the residents of Maruti Bungalows 1 and II. According to the residents, the army cited security reasons as the cause for closure of road  On Saturday morning, when the residents tried to remove the fencing, they were stopped by the army jawans. “The army officials told us that from now on we’ll have to use the Hansol CST depot road. That means we’ll have to take a three km detour to reach the main road. While the closed road is just 500 metre from the main road,” said a resident, Jaydev Vanjani.  The alternative road is not usable say the residents. Nisha Khanchandani said, “The alternative road that the army has directed us to use is in a bad shape. We can’t drive our vehicles on that road. Also, the entire area is deserted. It’s not safe for girls and elderly people. Moreover, vendors also have stopped coming to our society. We have been cut off.”  It should be noted that the residents of Maruti Bungalows have been using the said road for the past seven years. On June 6, 2005, the residents had got permission from the AMC to use the road. According to the residents, the civic body had stated that the land between the firing range and cantonment belonged to it and they could use the road till further notice from the government.  Dr Kaushal Asnani, a resident of Maruti Bungalows, said, “When we contacted AMC Commissioner I P Gautam to help us, he told us that he was helpless. He told us that the army was not listening to the AMC and we should follow the army’s orders.” Angered, the residents called the police who visited the spot but returned without taking any action.  Bharatsinh Rajput, army cantonment ward president, said, “We are going to take up this matter with higher authorities. This is inhuman. They didn’t even inform us before shutting the road. We are going to use non violent protest to get justice. We have sent a letter to Union Defence Minister AK Antony about the situation here. We will also approach Chief Minister Narendra Modi and high court.”  Residents of Maruti bungalows held a dharna near the airport circle.  “A civil suit was filed in 1995 about the use of this road. At the time, the court had directed that a status quo should be maintained, say residents of the locality,” Hemant Rupala one of the residents said. “Right now, even the 108 or fire brigade cannot enter our locality. What if an emergency arises?” he added.  Another resident Babubhai Panjwani said, “We have been living here for years. The army’s security has never been violated. So what happened suddenly?”  Despite several attempts by Mirror to contact the defence PRO, they remained unavailable for comment.









Spat ‘freezes’ army promotions
Defence ministry questions policy tweak by general, 18 major generals hit SUJAN DUTTA  New Delhi, April 5: Promotions of senior officers in the Indian Army are effectively frozen after a spat between the defence ministry and army headquarters over the policy to determine the eligibility of major generals and brigadiers.  The chief of army staff, General V.K. Singh, has now been asked by the ministry to explain why he has tweaked the promotion policy formulated by his predecessor, General (now retired) Deepak Kapoor, that was approved by defence minister A.K. Antony in January 2009, a defence ministry source said.  The upshot of the spat between the ministry and the chief is that 18 major generals understood to have been cleared for promotion to the rank of lieutenant general run the risk of having to retire without reaching the next higher rank.  Lieutenant general is the highest rank in the army after the chief, who is a general. A major general serves for two years less than a lieutenant general who retires at 60 years.  The difference between the ministry and army headquarters has also frozen the promotion of brigadiers to the next rank of major general. (A brigadier serves for two years less than a major general).  The promotions board was to have been convened in September last year. But since General Singh took over as the army chief in April and formed a committee to re-examine the policy, that board was not held.  A board held in January this year cleared promotions to the rank of lieutenant general under a new set of rules. But the defence ministry has frozen the recommendations.  Officers promoted to the rank of lieutenant general have to be approved by the defence minister and their appointments have to be cleared by the Cabinet Committee on Appointments (CCA).  Every day’s delay means that the officers are more likely to retire because the pyramid in the army hierarchy gets sharper at the top.  The freezing of the appointments also means that crucial posts — for example, in the Directorate General of Military Intelligence (DGMI), the Military Operations Directorate and general-officers-commanding some divisions and corps — are vacant.  Corps are commanded by lieutenant generals and divisions are commanded by major generals. There are an estimated 79 posts in the army for lieutenant generals.  In the promotions policy approved in January 2009 by the defence minister, the norms were decided on the basis of quantifiable performance.  Officers were rated on the basis of battle performance, tough postings, previous record of command, courses and gallantry awards. Only a 5 per cent weight was attached to value judgement by the promotions board, defence ministry sources had explained then.  But last year, army headquarters decided to take a re-look at the policy. During General Kapoor’s tenure, general-ranked officers were divided into two categories — for command and staff.  Apparently, General Singh does not favour this and wants flexibility to allow major generals and lieutenant generals to be either in command or in staff positions that involve assignment at headquarters.  Since the new recommendations were made, bureaucrats in the defence ministry have questioned why successive army chiefs tinker with the promotions policy.  Though publicly unstated, bureaucrats say in private there is suspicion that certain officers are favoured and some are not.  The army chief has met the defence minister on the stalled promotions. But army headquarters is understood to have to have been asked to resolve its own issues and return with an acceptable recommendation.









Industry cold on breakthroughs in military hardware tech: Experts
Scientists from the Army and premier educational institutes like IISc and IITs have produced some of the best prototypes of military equipment. But there has been a complete lack of willingness from the industrial giants to take up these path-breaking technologies on mass production, experts said a meeting of the Army Technology Board (ATB) at the Electronics and Mechanical Engineering School (EME) here.  Lieutenant General K Surendra Nath, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Army Training Command, said, “The efforts made by the scientists should not go in vain and there should be a continuous monitoring of the projects till the final stage.”  He added: “The strength of the ATB comes from its members, which includes the directors of all Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), Indian Institute of Science (IISc), as well as Commandants of the Army’s premier technical training institutions. The Defence Research and Development Organisation and Public Sector Undertakings like Bharat Electronics Limited are also closely associated with the projects being undertaken through ATB.”
A large number of projects related to military equipment based on the latest technology was considered for development during the meeting. The Centre has ATB instituted ATB with a charter to act as a medium for exchange of knowledge in collaboration with academia to identify and fund technological research, studies and developmental projects.  An official said: “The core concept behind organising and having such a joint body is to make India independent as far as technology is concerned. It takes a long time to take the prototype of a technology for mass production, but we have not heard anything from the industries so far.”









China's presence in PoK 'increasing steadily': Army commander
JAMMU: China's presence in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) is "increasing steadily" and its troops are "actually present" along the Line-of-Control, a top Army commander said, adding the Chinese footprints are "too close for comfort" for India.  "Chinese presence in Gilgit-Baltistan and the Northern Areas is increasing steadily... There are many people who are concerned about the fact that if there was to be hostility between us and Pakistan, what would be the complicity of Chinese. Not only they are in the neighbourhood but the fact that they are actually present and stationed along the LoC," Northern Army commander Lt Gen KT Parnaik said here last week while addressing a seminar.  He said China's links with Pakistan through PoK "lends strength" to the "nexus" between the two countries which is a cause of "great security concern" for India.  "As part of (China's) 'strings of pearls' policy, Chinese footprints are too close for comfort," Parnaik added.  The Army commander said such a nexus between the Chinese and Pakistani military "jeopardises our regional strategic interests in the long run and and facilitates speedy and enhanced deployment of Pakistan armed forces to complement China's military operations and thus outranks India."  He said China has been found to be involved in the construction of numerous roads and and several hydro-power projects inside PoK.  Beijing is laying a web of roads that run across areas as distant from each other as Skardu in PoK and Kunming in China near Myanmar border.  China has already constructed roads connecting all its highways to logistic centres and major defence installations that dot the border with India and the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in south-eastern Jammu and Kashmir.





Centre planning to station Army permanently in Kashmir:Geelani
Srinagar, Apr 5 (PTI) The Hardline Hurriyat Conference today alleged that the statements made by Union Defence Minister A K Antony and a senior Army commander in the Kashmir Valley were an indication that the Centre was planning to settle the armed forces permanently in Jammu and Kashmir. "The Indian government is planning to settle its armed forces in Kashmir permanently and is working at different levels to achieve this plan, but Kashmiris will never accept the occupation of their land," Hurriyat Chairman Syed Ali Shah Geelani said in a statement here. Geelani was reacting to the statements of Union Defence Minister A K Antony and General Officer Commanding of Srinagar-based 15 corps Lt General S A Hasnain. While Antony had ruled out any reduction in the number of troops in the state, Lt Gen Hasnain had said the troops are being trained in Kashmiri language. "It is part of a larger conspiracy to settle the troops in the Valley," Geelani alleged. The Hurriyat hawk reiterated his demand for complete withdrawal of troops from the state, stating that bilateral dialogue between India and Pakistan or Srinagar and New Delhi cannot help in the resolution of the Kashmir issue. "It is in the interest of the India to accept the ground realities, give up rigidness and fulfill the promises made to the people of Kashmir," he said.









Why Indian defence needs to keep pace with China
The defence capability differential between China and India [ Images ] is rising at an alarming rate.  This will continue to constrain India's rise as a major regional and global player of any significance, says Harsh V Pant.  China has declared that its official defence budget for 2011 will rise by 12.7 percent from the previous year. Last year there was a lot of hoopla surrounding the fact that China had announced a mere 7.5 percent jump in its defence budget. It was the first time since the 1980s that China's defence spending increased in single-digit percentage. But this year we are back to the norm of double digit increases.  While the civilian leadership in China has tried to downplay the latest increase suggesting that much of the increase will go to human resources development, infrastructure and training, it is the response of the Chinese military that should be a matter of concern.  The military spokesman, Major General Luo Yuan, was unambiguous in suggesting that when it comes to military spending, there is no need for China 'to care about what others may think.' The international community has long demanded that China should be more transparent about the intentions behind its rapid defence spending. Now the Chinese military is making its strategic intent clear.  Divisions within China about the future course of nation's foreign policy are starker than ever before. It is now being suggested that much like young Japanese officers in the 1930s, young Chinese military officers are increasingly taking charge of strategy with the result that rapid military growth is shaping nation's broader foreign policy objectives.  Civil-military relations in China are under stress with the People's Liberation Army asserting its pride more forcefully than even before and demanding respect from other states. 'A country needs respect, and a military also needs respect,' wrote a major general last year in the PLA's newspaper. Not surprisingly, China has been more aggressive in asserting its interests not only vis-a-vis India but also vis-a-vis the US, the European Union, Japan [ Images ] and South-East Asian States.  The increasing assertion by the Chinese military and changing balance of power in the nation's civil-military relations should be a real cause of concern for China's neighbours. The pace of Chinese military modernisation has already taken the world by surprise and it is clear that the process is going much faster than many had anticipated.  A growing economic power, China is now concentrating on the accretion of military might so as to secure and enhance its own strategic interests. China, which has the largest standing army in the world with more than 2.3 million members, continues to make the most dramatic improvements in its nuclear force among the five nuclear powers and improvements in its conventional military capabilities are even more impressive.  What has been causing concern in Asia and beyond is the opacity that seems to surround China's military build-up, with an emerging consensus that Beijing's [ Images ] real military spending is at least double the announced figure.  The official figures of the Chinese government do not include the cost of new weapon purchases, research or other big-ticket items for China's highly secretive military and as a result, the real figures are much higher than the revealed amount.  Despite this, India's defence modernisation programme is faltering. This year the Indian government has allocated only 1.8 percent of the GDP to defence, though ostensibly the military expenditure has gone up by 11.58 percent. This is only the second time in over three decades that the defence to GDP ratio has fallen below 2 percent of the GDP.  This is happening at a time when India is expected to spend $112 billion on capital defense acquisitions over the next five years in what is being described as 'one of the largest procurement cycles in the world.' Indian military planners are shifting their focus away from Pakistan as China takes centre-stage in future strategic planning.  Over the past two decades, the military expenditure of India has been around 2.75 percent but since India has been experiencing significantly higher rates of economic growth over the last decade compared to any other time in its history, the overall resources that it has been able to allocate to its defence needs has grown significantly.  The armed forces for long have been asking for an allocation of 3 percent of the nation's GDP to defence. This has received a broad political support in recent years. Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh [ Images ] has been explicit about it, suggesting that 'if our economy grows at about 8 percent per annum, it will not be difficult for (the Indian government) to allocate about 3 percent of GDP for national defence.'  Parliament has also underlined the need to aim for the target of 3 percent of GDP. Yet as a percentage of GDP, the annual defence spending has declined to one of its lowest levels since 1962.  But defence expenditure alone will not solve all the problems plaguing Indian defence policy. More damagingly, for the last several years now the defence ministry has been unable to spend its budgetary allocation, this year being an exception. The defence acquisition process remains mired in corruption and bureaucratese.  A series of defence procurement scandals since late 1980s have also made the bureaucracy risk averse, thereby delaying the acquisition process. A large part of the money is surrendered by the defence forces every year given their inability to spend due to labyrinthine bureaucratic procedures involved in the procurement process.  India's indigenous defence production industry has time and again made its inadequacy to meet the demands of the armed forces apparent. The Indian armed forces keep waiting for arms and equipment while the finance ministry is left with an unspent budget year after year. Most large procurement programmes get delayed resulting in cost escalation and technological or strategic obsolescence of the budgeted items.  The Indian government is yet to demonstrate the political will to tackle the defence policy paralysis that seems to be rendering all the claims of India's rise as a military power increasingly hollow.  The capability differential between China and India is rising at an alarming rate. This will continue to constrain India's rise as a major regional and global player of any significance.










Army Chief discusses op, training issues
Chandigarh, Apr 5 (PTI) Army Chief General V K Singh today discussed operational and training issues with Lt Gen S R Ghosh, GOC-in-C of the Command. A defence release said Gen Singh also met participants of a two-day Tri Service Seminar on the Ex-Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) conducted by the Western Command. He complimented the participants for their dedication and commitment to make the ECHS a success towards providing medical care to those in far flung areas. The release said that General Singh also inaugurated the Basantar Sainik Aramgrah in Sector 2 Panchkula. Gen Singh dedicated the 56-room complex to the heroes of the Indian Army who had devoted their lives to the service of the nation, it said. The complex will provide much-needed transit facilities to both outstations veterans and serving soldiers coming here for medical treatment or for various other requirements. Earlier, Gen Singh visited the Western Command headquarters at Chandimandir near here.





No comments:

Post a Comment

 

Mail your comments, suggestions and ideas to me

Template created by Rohit Agarwal