Custom Search Engine - Scans Selected News Sites


Thursday, 25 September 2014

From Today's Papers - 25 Sep 2014

 PLA doesn’t differ with Xi, says Chinese envoy
Ajay Banerjee
Tribune News Service

New Delhi, September 24
Laying to rest any doubts that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of China was differing with the Xi Jinping-led Government in Beijing on the ongoing military stand-off with India, Le Yucheng, Chinese Ambassador to India, today said the Chinese Army was fully under the control of the communist party government in his country.

The Ambassador added, due to the dispute it was difficult to tell “who crossed the border”. Yechung, who was appointed just two weeks ago, was answering questions after a discussion “Modi-Xi Summit: A new beginning” organised this morning by the India East Asia Foundation (IEAF).

“You should not believe in rumours,” Yucheng said when asked if the PLA did not listen to Xi Jinping on withdrawing to end the stand-off at Chumar, South Eastern Ladakh.

The matter was discussed in New Delhi on September 18 between Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The Indian Army and the PLA stand facing each other at an altitude of 14,500 feet since September 10 refusing to budge an inch. “The Army is fully under the control of the party. The Army will listen to the President, there is no question over that”, the Ambassador said.

Questions had arisen in India and elsewhere as the Chinese Defence Ministry website said Jinping met the top leadership of the PLA on September 22 at Beijing.

In a rather strange message that was interpreted for its connotations, the website quoted him as having said: “Headquarters of PLA forces must have absolute loyalty and firm faith in the Communist Party of China, guarantee a smooth chain of command and make sure all decisions from the Central leadership are fully implemented”.

Since Jinping is also Chairman of the Central Military Commission (CMC), it has raised doubts and many in Indian strategic community questioned if the PLA was acting on its own at Chumar or it had ignored the outcome of Modi-Jinping talks.

Yechung, spoke in Chinese. His translator told the audience: “The Army is under party to serve and safeguard territorial integrity of the country. Army is for peaceful development. China is always ready to develop friendship with our neighbours we don’t want any conflict, even small one”.

On the pending border dispute, a 168 year old legacy, Yechung said “the issues are very complicated. It would be common and reasonable to have some disputes.”

Narrating how it was complicated, the Ambassador said: “China has one story (about the border) and India has one of its own and it is very hard to say who crossed the border”.

He suggested, “Before final settlement we can maintain peace.”

Prof Tan Chung, a scholar on India-China relations, TCA Rangachari, a former Ambassador and Tarun Vijay, Rajya Sabha MP and president of India-China Parliamentary Friendship Group, also assessed the Modi-Jingping meeting and termed it as positive outcome.

China ‘withdraws troops’ from 30-R

* The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has reportedly reduced the number of its troops at 30-R, the first point of the ongoing flare-up

* A senior functionary said it could be a move by the PLA to either rotate its troops or to bluff India into complacency

* However, the stand-off continues at the location and troops are strung across an arch of 2 km.
Priorities for Prime Minister Modi’s Visit: U.S. and India Must Cooperate for Asian Stability
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the United States next week provides an opportunity to strengthen U.S.–India ties, which stagnated during the second term of Modi’s predecessor, Manmohan Singh. During the visit, President Barack Obama should demonstrate the importance the U.S. attaches to the bilateral relationship and offer cooperation on economic, defense, and security issues.

The Obama Administration has at times relegated the relationship with India to a lower category of priority than it merits, but both sides have shown interest in moving beyond negative atmospherics and specific irritants, like the revocation of Modi’s U.S. visa over the 2002 Gujarat riots and last year’s arrest of a U.S.-based Indian diplomat.

The visit will be observed closely by other Asian powers: namely, China and Japan, both of which recently held high-level bilateral visits of their own with Modi. It is important that the Obama–Modi summit demonstrate the strength of U.S.–India ties at a time when the power dynamics in Asia are shifting.
Warm Welcome

President Obama is scheduled to meet Prime Minister Modi on September 29 and 30 following a major speech that Modi will give the day before to around 20,000 people, most of them Indian Americans, in Madison Square Garden. In an official announcement of the Obama–Modi meetings, a U.S. National Security Council official said that Modi’s White House engagements over a two-day period are a sign of the importance the Administration attaches to its relations with India.

Although Modi will not address a joint session of Congress (as the Indian American community had earlier hoped) because Congress is out of session, the U.S. Senate passed a bipartisan resolution last week designating September 30 as “U.S.–India Partnership Day” and noting that the relationship—made up of a “special and permanent bond”—will continue to define the 21st century.
Busy Foreign Policy Agenda

Modi’s visit to the U.S. is part of a hectic foreign policy schedule. In early September, Modi made a successful five-day visit to Japan, where he and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe agreed to elevate their dialogue to a “Special Strategic and Global Partnership.” Japan committed to investing $35 billion in Indian projects over the next five years, and the two sides agreed to explore elevating their trilateral dialogue with the U.S. to the foreign minister level, a step that Washington would welcome. Many viewed Modi’s remark that Japan and India were focused on economic development, not expansionism, as an oblique criticism of China and its approach to territorial disputes.

Modi appears to be interested in improving strategic ties with Japan as a hedge against China. Border disputes between India and China continue to simmer, despite a substantial improvement in their trade and economic ties (bilateral trade has increased from around $5 billion in 2002 to over $66 billion in 2013). Modi and his senior advisers may calculate that cooperating more closely with Japan in areas like maritime cooperation, nuclear issues, and stronger economic and investment ties will strengthen New Delhi’s hand in dealing with Beijing and help to deter any potential Chinese border aggression.

Against this backdrop, Chinese President Xi Jinping’s three-day visit to India last week did not go as well as anticipated, largely due to a flare-up in border tensions. Chinese leaders had put on a charm offensive toward India shortly after the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came to power. Recognizing that India’s clout on the world stage is likely to grow under Modi, the Chinese sought to focus on cooperation, not competition. President Xi’s decision to skip Pakistan on his visit to South Asia—even though it was likely due to concerns about the internal security situation—played well in India.

As the Chinese President’s visit approached, however, Sino–Indian border tensions intensified. About 1,000 Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops set up camps in mountainous regions in Ladakh on the Indian side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC), and an equal number of Indian troops deployed to forward positions in the area. The border standoff was reported in the Indian press and took the sheen off of Xi’s visit. PM Modi called on China to demarcate the LAC, which further dampened the atmosphere and took the focus away from the economic and trade agenda.

Sino–Indian border tensions previously had flared in April 2013 when Chinese troops camped for three weeks several miles inside Indian territory in the Ladakh region. That border spat was defused when India agreed to destroy some military structures along the border and both sides withdrew their troops, clearing the way for a planned visit to India by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao.
Build Indo–U.S. Ties

It is in the U.S. interest to build closer ties with India, for numerous reasons. India is an emerging economy that provides opportunities for U.S. trade and investment, a strategically important country in maintaining a stable balance of power in the Asia Pacific, and a democratic nation with a large Muslim minority that provides a model of an ethnically and religiously diverse society that maintains freedom for its citizens. The recent shifting power dynamics in the region characterized by Modi’s successful Japan visit and simmering Sino–Indian border tensions drive home the important role that India plays in the U.S. Asia rebalance strategy.

During Modi’s visit, the U.S. should:

    Highlight the opportunity to expand economic and business relations so long as Modi remains committed to a pro-liberalization agenda. A major part of the visit will consist of Modi interacting with the U.S. business community in New York and Washington in an effort to encourage greater U.S. investment, especially in India’s infrastructure sector. U.S. leaders must make clear to Modi that U.S. businesses are looking for signs that India will maintain momentum on economic reform and provide a stable and private-sector-friendly business environment.
    Emphasize defense cooperation in an atmosphere of strategic understanding, building on steps announced by U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel during his visit to India in August. Modi has highlighted the need to modernize India’s armed forces, and the U.S. is poised to play a significant role in helping to fill Indian defense requirements. During his August visit to India, Secretary Hagel discussed dozens of proposals for India to consider with regard to co-production of defense items and transfer of technology. Hagel said that the U.S. is willing to be patient while India considers its security needs and would respect India’s desire for strategic autonomy.

    It is important that both sides continue to demonstrate understanding of the strategic context in which each is operating. While BJP leaders may calculate that it is in India’s interest to draw closer to the U.S., they also will point out that India shares a border with China and thus must be cognizant of Chinese perceptions of India’s foreign policy.
    Coordinate on strategies to counter terrorist movements in South Asia, especially in Afghanistan as U.S. and NATO forces draw down. Given al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri’s recent pledge to launch a South Asia wing and the Islamic State gaining ground in Iraq, the imperative for close U.S.–India counterterrorism cooperation has never been stronger. Obama and Modi must coordinate their responses to these brewing threats and seek ways to cooperate in preventing the Taliban from staging a comeback in Afghanistan.
    Manage expectations on visit outcomes to avoid a sense of disappointment. In the past, the relationship has suffered from each side having overly optimistic expectations of what the other side can deliver to solidify ties. While the two sides have largely convergent strategic interests, the fact that they are both large democracies means that institutional change can be complex and slow. For this reason, initiatives like the Defense Trade and Technology Initiative aimed at breaking down bureaucratic obstacles to defense cooperation are particularly important, but these initiatives also require patience and persistence and take time to bear fruit.


The stage is set for a successful Modi visit to Washington, but the White House must guard against allowing the myriad international crises happening around the globe to overshadow the visit and weaken Indo–U.S. bilateral ties. Engaging with a strategically like-minded partner such as India takes on greater importance as the U.S. grapples with multiple global challenges. U.S.–India cooperation is particularly important when it comes to countering international terrorism and maintaining a stable balance of power in the Asia Pacific.
Indian Army’s ‘expansionist’ plan
New Delhi Times’ September 13, 2014 article “Expansion: the call of the hour for Indian Army” must be alarming for neighbouring countries, especially Pakistan, for it further indicates to the expansionist designs of New Delhi. Dr Ankit Srivastava, the author who happens to be the Editor of New Delhi Times, highlights on one hand the strengths of the Indian army and on the other emphasizes on acquiring the most modern weaponry and machination for making the Indian army capable of “facing any threat whether it is foreign or indigenous.”

Dr Ankit suggests to expanding the army internally by revamping and modernizing it, and by enhancing its participation in the missions abroad either under the UN umbrella or under the allied forces supervision. He says the Indian army needs new field artillery as its existing firepower can last for only 20 days. He points to Indian Air Force’s concerns about the obsolete nature of ground based air defence systems, and Indian Navy’s depleting and ageing submarines because as a next superpower India has to position itself strategically and utilize its armed forces accordingly.

Three messages from Dr Ankit’s article are noteworthy: firstly, India is going to make its army strong through indigenous means, world standard training of its personnel, as well as by purchasing modern weapons and defence equipment from other countries; secondly, India is going to expand its operations all over the world projecting them as peaceful and for the betterment of the region; thirdly, India views China as a threat and wants the South Asian region as well as western countries to give importance to India and make it strong to face China if the need arises. Pakistan’s diplomatic channels, media and intelligentsia need to highlight and expose Indian designs in the region and its global power struggle that can cause imbalance particularly amongst the neighbouring countries. Pakistan also needs to take the Indian ambitions as serious and must not merely rely on its intentions to engage India through talks. It must continue working with its friendly countries towards strengthening the armed forces, modernizing its weaponry and making its defence impregnable.
Defence Minister visits Behrampore military station
New Delhi: Taking stock of military capability building along the China border, Defence Minister Arun Jaitley on Wednesday visited the Behrampore military station in Murshidabad which will part of the new Mountain Strike Corps being raised there.

"The Defence Minister visited the eastern theatre and was briefed on the upcoming Behrampore Military Station, in Murshidabad District of West Bengal," an Army statement aid.

India is raising the new 17 Mountain Strike Corps along the China border and its headquarters will be in Panagarh in West Bengal.

Its formations would be scattered from Ladakh in Jammu and Kashmir to Arunachal Pradesh.

Army Chief General Dalbir Singh Suhag long with Eastern Army Commander Lt Gen MMS Rai were also present during the briefing to the Defence Minister.

"The Rs 600-crore project in the 250-acre land is set to be an eco-friendly 'model military camp' that will be replicated in all future infrastructural developments of similar military stations wherever feasible," the Army said.

Located nearly mid-way between Kolkata and Siliguri, the military station, when ready will also help boost the local economy in the area.

The Army Chief also visited Panagarh Military Camp where he took stock of on going preparations for raising of the Army's Strike Corps.

Suhag will now visit forward positions along the Chinese frontier in Arunachal Pradesh and other areas. 

No comments:

Post a Comment


Mail your comments, suggestions and ideas to me

Template created by Rohit Agarwal