Custom Search Engine - Scans Selected News Sites

Loading

Tuesday, 17 November 2015

From Today's Papers - 17 Nov 2015






http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/india-china-agree-to-keep-border-peace/159251.html
India, China agree to keep border peace
Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service
New Delhi, November 16

India and China tonight announced to implement the consensus reached between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping on ensuring peace and tranquility along the disputed and undemarcated boundary between the two nations.

The decision was taken at a meeting between Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar and Gen Fan Changlong, Vice-Chairman of the Central Military Commission of People’s Republic of China here tonight.

A statement of the Ministry of Defence said peace and tranquility in the India-China border areas is the cornerstone for smooth development of bilateral relations in diverse areas.

Laying greater responsibility on the two armed forces to lower tensions, Parrikar and Gen Fan have asked the militaries on both sides to shoulder important responsibilities for maintenance of peace.

The two sides agreed to further enhance communications and exchanges between the two armed forces. Gen Fan is currently on a three-day visit to India. He is leading a 26-member delegation that includes Admiral Sun Jianguo, Deputy Chief of General Staff and Lt Gen Zhu Fuxi, Political Commissar of Changdu Military Area Command.

This is the highest level of Chinese defence delegation to visit India in the recent years. During the meeting with the Defence Minister, the Chinese side welcomed the operationalisation of additional border personnel meeting points. The two sides reviewed the ongoing exchanges and expressed satisfaction at the bilateral military exercise “Hand-in-Hand”. Taking note of the intensification of defence exchanges, Indian side welcomed the proposal for the visit of Commander of Lanzhou Military region to India early next year. Lanzhou is one of the two military regions of China that face India. Gen Fan will call on the PM on November 17.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/nscn-k-declared-terror-organisation/159273.html
NSCN-K declared terror organisation
Tribune News Service

New Delhi, November 16
More than five months after Naga rebel outfit National Socialist Council of Nagaland-Khaplang (NSCN-K) carried out an audacious attack on an Army convoy in Manipur that left 18 soldiers dead, the Central Government today declared the outfit a terror organisation.

All its formations and front organisations will be deemed to be a terrorist organisation under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

A gazette notification has been issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, a spokesperson said today. The NSCN-K came into existence in 1988 and is active along the India-Myanmar border.

The outfit has resorted to terror by killing innocent civilians and security forces and engaged in other violent activities, including the June 4 attack on the Army convoy in Chandel district of Manipur, said a spokesperson for the MHA.

The NSCN-K has not joined in the Naga-peace accord announced between the Government of India and the NSCN- Isaac Muivah — another rebel outfit.

As many as 38 organisations are banned under the UAPA which was amended in the aftermath of the November 2008 Mumbai terror attacks.

Pulled out of peace pact in March

* The NSCN-K, which came into existence in 1988, had signed a peace pact with the Centre in March 2001 but pulled out unilaterally in March this year

* The NIA has announced a bounty of Rs 17 lakh on two top leaders of the NSCN-K, including its chief SS Khaplang and Niki Sumi, self-styled chief of the armed wing

* Sumi is alleged to have led a group of rebels on June 4 that targeted an Army convoy in Manipur that left 18 soldiers dead

http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/uttarakhand/40-ex-servicemen-five-veer-naris-return-their-medals/158962.html
40 ex-servicemen, five Veer Naris return their medals
Tribune News Service

Dehradun, November 16
As many as 40 ex-servicemen and five Veer Naris returned their medals at Parade Ground here today to register their _protest against the Union Government.

They are not happy with the clauses added in _One Rank One Pension (OROP) scheme.

Earlier, the ex-servicemen under the aegis of the United Front of Ex-Servicemen (UFESM), Uttarakhand chapter, raised slogans at Parade Ground. Later, _they submitted their medals, which will be sent to President Pranab Mukherjee soon.

An ex-servicemen said those who did not bring their medals today but wanted to return them could submit the same at the the office of the Uttarakhand Ex-services League (UESL).

Maj Gen Lalji D Singh (retd) said it was not easy to part with medals but they were being forced to do so due to “injustice” being done in the sanctioning of OROP. He added disparity in pension would not be tolerated at any cost.

Maj Gen Chander Nandwani (retd), President of the UFESM, said the Union Government _had decided to form a one-man committee to _address the grievances of ex-servicemen, which was not acceptable.

He said the government should form at least a five-member committee comprising three retired defence personnel _and one serving Army officer and a government _representative.

Brig KG Behl (retd), media in charge of the UFESM, said ex-servicemen had only one demand and that was OROP. “The so-called five demands being talked by the Centre are only five hurdles included in the notification to make it unwieldy and against the principles of OROP,” he added.

More than 300 ex-servicemen, including Brig RS Rawat (retd), Brig Vijay Kumar (retd), Col BM Thapa (retd), Col PL Parashar (retd), Lt Col DS Cheema (retd), Major D Chaudhary (retd) and Capt Neel Kumar Thapa (retd), were present.

http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/pil-for-women-s-entry-into-territorial-army/159252.html
PIL for women’s entry into Territorial Army
Vijay Mohan

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, November 16
Close in the wake of the government’s decision to allow women pilots to join the IAF’s combat stream as fighter pilots, women, a public interest litigation (PIL) filed before the Delhi High Court seeking entry of women into the Territorial Army (TA) has raised the possibility of women in the civvy street playing a meaningful role in military operations.

The PIL, filed by a Delhi-based lawyer has sought that gainfully employed women be allowed to join the TA, a volunteer force of citizens who are employed in the civilian sector, but are imparted military training and can be called upon for active service in times of emergency to complement the regular army.

“The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for the protection of the interest of women at large to allow female (gainfully employed) candidates to be recruited in the TA on a par with males,” says petitioner’s counsel Jyotika Kalra.

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/orop-indias-defence-operations-are-degrading-says-representative-of-united-front-of-ex-servicemen/
OROP: ‘India’s defence operations are degrading’, says representative of United Front of Ex-servicemen -
As ex-servicemen continue to press their demand for One Rank One Pension, Brig Harwant Singh (retd), a representative of United Front of Ex-servicemen, in an interview with Khushboo Sandhu, talks about the anomalies in the notification issued by the govt and the demands of the veterans

What are the demands of ex-servicemen?

One has to see the problem in totality and not in a segmented form. Defence and development go hand in hand. You cannot have development if you do not have strong defence operations. From 1948 onwards, the Army was degraded financially as well as in terms of status. In 1971, when we claimed our biggest victory, the Third Pay Commission was in operation, whose report came out in 1973. Before the establishment of this commission, the pensions of sepoys and soldiers used to be 70 per cent of their last paid salaries. In case of civilians, the figure used to be 30 per cent. Bureaucrats, however, reduced the pensions of military people from 70 per cent to 50 per cent and increased their own from 30 per cent to 50 per cent.

That time they promised that military personnel would be given One Rank One Pension (OROP) and would be absorbed laterally so that they did not have to retire. That was the time when they made the report public after Field Marshal Manekshaw had retired. They were, maybe, apprehensive that if the report was opened during his tenure, he would take up the case strongly and their conspiracy would not succeed. Meanwhile, bureaucrats completely went back on their words. The defence forces took up the matter and nothing materialised because defence forces are, by and large, very well behaved and victims of the famous saying, ‘Sharafat Ali ko sharafat ne maara’.

In 1982, the government appointed a committee led by K P Singh Deo, who was the Minister of State. He was the one who coined the word One Rank One Pension. In fact, the then prime minister Indira Gandhi agreed in principle.

Unfortunately, she was assassinated and the matter did not go forward. Then came the Fourth Pay Commission, causing us more damage. The commission had given us rank pay, which was over and above the normal pay. The babus, however, while fixing the pay, reduced it. Major Dhanapalan noticed this and moved the court somewhere in 1991. The thing was corrected after almost two decades. Some people have now got arrears of rank pay.

Why did agitating ex-servicemen reject a notification issued recently by the government on One Rank One Pension?

There are three-four things that are badly missing in this. First, it is not OROP. The idea is that what a person gets today, old people will get the same length of service and the same ranks should get the same. Now, the person who retires next year will get more. Old people will not get that much as it will be revised every five years.

Second, they said that the pension would be an average amount. But we do not know what average is. We do not know what formula they use for calculation. They have taken the base year as 2013. On what basis have they done this?

The biggest damage is the system of premature retirement. It is after you have earned your pension. For a jawan it is 15 years and for an officer it is 20 years. This notification says that premature retirement will not be applicable for future retirees. The implication is that if your heart is not in the job, you will be forced to continue with it in the hope that if you go away, you will not get the benefit of OROP. Unmotivated people will be a drag on the system. In times of crisis, these people might create despondency. They will speak against the government and the system.

There has been a spate of protests across the country. What will be the future course of action?

We have been agitating ever since the Sixth Pay Commission report came. The VP Singh government had promised ordered bureaucracy to implement OROP. That did not happen. The Khurana Committee raised hopes to implement OROP. But, unfortunately, the elections in 2004 were preponed and the government lost.

The Sixth Pay Commission had a large number of anomalies and we started agitating fiercely. Every government promised, but nothing happened.

This notification has ignored the draft government letter agreed to by the three services and accounts people. Revision should be done annually and not after five years. The base year should be 2014. When it was accepted by the present government and the previous government, then 2013 has no relevance. We have had a number of rallies. We returned our medals and we will continue till the government agrees. We are not going to stop, because every year, 60, 000 people are retiring. We do not want new people to sit at Jantar Mantar.

So, the expectations ex-servicemen had from the current government have not been fulfilled?

Not at all. If the government had told us that they wouldn’t give OROP, we would have remained quiet. But they kept on raising our hopes. Parrikar [Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar] said hum jaldi karenge (We will implement it soon). Modi ji went to Siachen and promised the same thing. What they have given is peanuts.

What are the changes required in the current set-up?

You cannot live without the Army, and it has to be the best Army. Otherwise you will be defeated. It must be given lot of izzat (respect). When I was undergoing training in the Army, our adjutant was the maharaja of Jaipur. Our pensions were very high. The pension of a Brigadier was equivalent to that of the Chief Secretary. Over a period they have done away with that. There is no izzat, no money. So, why should anyone join the Army?

In India, they feel the Army is like any other department. It is not. It’s a different kettle of fish. Our people start retiring when they are 35. Then there is disruption— every two years they have to shift. What about lingering danger? There is a saying that second-rate incentives attract second-rate people. But defence operations of the country cannot be entrusted to second-rate people. It has happened in history and it is happening now. The day is not very far off when we will be worse off than what we were in 1962. History repeats itself. Unfortunately, our babus and netas are so blind they do not see the repercussions of war. We have become totally unfit to fight against either China or Pakistan.

We are making noise not because of money. It’s because the country’s defence operations are degrading. They, perhaps, are scared that agar fauj tagdi ho jaye to kha jayegi. Arre hum nahi khayenge (If the Army becomes stronger, it will swallow them).
- See more at:
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/orop-indias-defence-operations-are-degrading-says-representative-of-united-front-of-ex-servicemen/#sthash.plTQtEHZ.dpuf

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

Mail your comments, suggestions and ideas to me

Template created by Rohit Agarwal